- This topic has 9 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Yeah, so here it is in pretty big Quicktime…
So yeah — I like Daniel Craig, so I think it’ll be good….
I had my reserverations on why they picked Daniel Craig, but it looks good. Especially that piece of ass.
No kidding. Eva Green is in it, and if you’ve heard of her…well, shit, just search for Eva Green in Google Images…she’s kind of a butterface, but she’s got the body of a goddess.
I think Craig will be fine. I like how they’ve given Bond some mongrel too, some of the later ones have been too cute and ironic. It’ll be interesting to see how this movie stacks up to MI3.
- Women sense my power and they seek the life essence.
M:I III was kick ace. I sorta agree with Ebert in that there wasn’t enough actual story, but who cares? It was a great time! Action packed all the way.
I think that a lot of the movies out now have obvious bond influences. The Transporter, Mission Impossible movies, etc. So it’ll be interesting to see the “reboot” of the classic. He doe’s need to modernize himself a little from Pierce and a lot from the Moore and Connery to appeal to a newer audience (Lets not talk about Timothy Dalton). I mean go back and watch some of the older Bond films and even though they are classics, the fighting consisted of Moore kicking a dude down a flight of stairs and then running awkardly.
How long has it been since you’ve watched the Dalton Bond’s? They’re pretty damn good, in my opinion. I think Roger Moore was the worst, then George Lazenby, then Timothy Dalton, then Connery, then Brosnan. I liked the “dark” Bond better.
About a year ago, I bought all 20 Bond movies from some Chinese dude on eBay — I think it cost $80. What a deal. There were no special features or anything, but the movies were perfect. Over a few months, I watched all of them, and I was very impressed with the Dalton movies, and was quite disappointed that he got such a bad rep.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.